Why I Love You, Tonya Harding

29356401_10155141004621121_3736068534801243488_n

I must admit I was in no rush to catch I, Tonya when it first appeared in first-run theatres. Figure skating is not exactly my cup of tea, although I admire the beauty and skill of the sport. I have also attended Stars on Ice with my partner Val Cavalini, but more to appease her for my dragging her to see bands that she really has no interest in hearing

But, five minutes into the movie I knew that this was going to be an emotional and enlightening experience for me.

My knowledge of the 5’1″ skating dynamo was basically the same as everyone else who witnessed her meteoric rise and fall in the 1990s.

In short, she was gifted and very adept at the sport. She was the first American female figure skater to successfully perform the triple axel in a short program in 1991, a feat she never was able to accomplish again in her short career.

I also knew that she didn’t fit the mold of most female figure skaters. Unlike her “All American, Apple Pie” rival, Nancy Kerrigan, Harding was a “kid from the wrong side of the tracks” who smoked, swore like a sailor and hung out with lowlifes (who would have a negative influence on her career). All making her much different than her more privileged competitors, the little princesses who were all smiles and sequins.

And, of course, there was “The Incident,” as it is referred to in the movie.

A quick review of the incident: On January 6, 1994, Harding’s main team competitor Nancy Kerrigan was attacked after a practice session at the  1994 US Figure Skating Championships in Detroit by an assailant, later identified as Shane Stant. Harding’s ex-husband, Jeff Gillooly, and her self-appointed bodyguard, Shawn Eckhardt, hired Stant to break Kerrigan’s right leg so that she would be unable to compete at the 1994 Winter Olympics in Lillehammer.

Questions about Harding’s complicity in the attack created a media frenzy and scandal eventually leading to a court case which banned her for life from the American Figure Skating Association, bringing her career to a screeching halt.

Both in real life and the movie (as played convincingly well by Margot Robie), Harding insisted she knew nothing about the attack. Nevertheless, as Harding the movie character says after her banishment and the scandal “I became a punch-line.”

The opening credits proclaim that the movie is “Based on irony-free, wildly contradictory, totally true interviews with Tonya Harding and Jeff Gillooly.” From beginning to end I, Tonya allows its key characters to speak directly to the audience, through faux interviews that reproduce the boxy frames of TV reportage, and through fourth-wall breaks during the action.

Margot Robie is fantastic as the outsider red-neck Harding and it’s easy to understand why she received an Oscar nod for her performance. She is Tonya Harding in this movie, and it’s only when you see photographs of her and the real Harding that you notice how dissimilar the two really are.

Allison Janney as Tonya’s chain-smoking mother, LaVona, is equally as convincing. And she scores some of the best lines in the movie. “Show me a family that doesn’t have ups and downs!” she says after an abusive episode beween her and daughter. It’s easy to understand why she won an Oscar for her role.

The other supporting actors are all similarly convincing in their roles. Jeff Gillooy (as played by Sebastian Stan), Harding’s abusive husband, and his bumbling sidekicks provide comic relief, and it comes as no surprise to the audience why their scheme unfolded and they were apprehended quickly.

To be sure, the film captures the gritty realism of Harding’s “white trash” redneck upbringing and demeanour better than any film in my memory. Abusive parents, heavy drinking, premarital sex, excessive profanity (F-Bombs fly throughout the movie as does the four letter word for a woman’s vagina), and a general sense of despair are the hallmarks of underclass life. Today, Harding, her mother, and her cohorts would likely be Trump supporters wearing “Make America Great” ball-caps.

And here’s where my emotional attachment to the film comes in.

Like Harding, I was a working-class kid born on the wrong sides of the tracks, raised on Mother’s Allowance by a single mother who was both negligent and alcoholic. My absentee father, also an alcoholic and self-proclaimed con man, drifted in and out of my life, wreaking havoc and chaos each time he reappeared. The word “Fuck” was used as a noun, verb, adjective and adverb in our dysfunctional home. And like Harding, my self-esteem and self-image suffered as a consequence. As an escape, I turned to intellectual pursuits and learned how to play the drums after seeing The Beatles on Ed Sullivan in 1964. From that point on, all I wanted to be was a rock star.

Eschewing school (I once had a report card so bad, the Principal recommended that I immediately transfer to the local vocational school where I could learn a trade and become a contributor to society) for my Rock ‘n’ Roll career, I stumbled through most of my adolescence, choosing to live on my own at age 17.

After playing in a string of London rock bands, some very good and others not so much so, I applied to and was accepted by the University of Western Ontario as a Mature Student in 1975. Earning degrees in History & Politics and Education, I was on the Dean’s Honour each year of my attendance. Upon graduation, I was lucky enough to catch on with the London Board of Education (to later become the TVDSB), where I spent the next thirty years teaching high school History and coaching Football and Rugby.

Obviously, my childhood and adolescent experiences mirror to a certain extent those of Harding. Always consciously aware of my social class and unique upbringing, I usually felt like an outsider in most social situations, and run-ins with established authority figures were frequent (something that continued with administrators during my teaching career).

And like Harding, I grew up with a chip on my shoulder the size of a two-by-four. For me, words were my weapon of choice, and I developed a sharp tongue and wit, puncturing as many bourgeois balloons as possible along the way.

As a result, throughout most of the movie, I had my fists clenched in anger of how Harding was treated by her so-called “betters” and authority figures. At one point, I broke into tears when Harding confronts a judge about her marks and he politely tells her that she doesn’t fit the model of a figure skater suggesting to her that she find another sport. It was all I could do to prevent myself from shouting “Punch him in the fucking chops” at the screen.

To sum up, while for most people, I, Tonya may be an extremely well done depiction of a recent event in sports and cultural history, for some of us, it’s like seeing our lives portrayed on the silver screen.

And it is for that reason, I have to shout: I Love You Tonya Harding!

 

 

 

 

 

 

My Thoughts About The Proposed BRT Project -Revised

5747b0e844e04.image

I’ve been giving a lot of thought to the City of London’s proposed Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project lately.

And based on the available evidence and conflicting opinions about the controversial project – the most expensive infrastructure effort in London’s history – I have reached the conclusion that it must be rejected in its present form.

In fact, I’m not even convinced that a Bus Rapid Transit as such is called for given London’s 20-minute city size by car. A better option, it appears to me, is a rationalized existing LTC service with more buses as necessity dictates, increased frequency and growth into the neighbourhoods and areas of the city currently under-served or not being served at all.

To be sure, the current project appears to me to be essentially the brainchild of Shift, a relatively small but very vocal group of young urban millennials, who are convinced that BRT must be built to serve the student populations of Western University and Fanshawe College in the fleeting hope that graduating students will be so grateful that they will stay in London, live, work and raise families here.  Many of these supporters are also people who are disappointed that their original goal of a Light Rail Transit (LRT) system, complete with a very expensive tunnel under Richmond Street, was rejected by city council who saw the folly of such a plan prompted by a backlash of vocal opponents like Downshift and downtown merchants. BRT will have to do in its place.

Sound silly? Of course, because it is.

Out-of-town young people will continue to attend London’s fine post-secondary institutions and upon graduation, go where the jobs are. In essence, follow the money, just like they always have and always will.

To put it in perspective, just imagine for a moment that every student who has ever attended Western or Fanshawe remained in London. The city would be bursting at its seams and have a huge surplus of cheap labour with a diminished manufacturing base and limited opportunities in the much vaunted high-tech sector, which, after all, employs relatively few workers per company.

BRT proponents will counter this argument with the claim that many of these students will bring much-needed entrepreneurial skills to the city. Fair enough, but successful entrepreneurs are in reality few and far between. If they weren’t, we would all be millionaires. It’s like saying every boy or girl born in Canada has the opportunity to become Prime Minister some day. Sounds good, but not based in reality as a lot of other socio-economic factors come into play.

Vocal critics like Shawn Lewis, mayoralty candidates Paul Paolatto and Paul Cheng, former London Free Press reporter Chip Martin, and the lobby group Downshift, argue that BRT must be revised to meet the needs of all Londoners, especially those who would still be left out in the cold by the proposed routes, or be scratched outright.

It’s clear as the nose on your face that BRT will be the major issue in the coming municipal election in October 2018.

Mayor Matt Brown (who has announced he will not be running for re-election) and most of the other city councillors have essentially hinged their political careers on BRT and are fighting hard to see it through fruition, despite mounting public pleas and demands to slow down the process. Opposing them are announced mayoralty candidates Cheng and Paolatto, and maybe Shawn Lewis, and other council candidates who have yet to identify themselves.

Many, like Martin, believe that BRT will be the downfall of Brown and his sycophants:

“This council will learn what rejection is all about.

Its members have repeatedly backed the Shift plan at every twist and turn. The occasional word of wisdom has come from Coun. Phil Squire, whose ward faces major dislocation. The bus plan, the largest capital project in city history, has become divisive in London because of the way it has been rushed, promoted and rammed through. Voters are unhappy.

Mayor Matt Brown, whose leadership skills and expertise seem limited to ribbon cuttings and greetings to gatherings, with a sideline of adultery, will not be a factor. Expect him to find a post somewhere to avoid his inevitable humiliation at the hands of voters. Many of his backers from last time have fled.”

So here we are only eight months away from what will undoubtedly be one of the most contentious and acrimonious elections in London’s history.

The battle lines are drawn and the level of citizen engagement is sure to increase dramatically over the weeks and months to come.

Now that Matt Brown has voluntarily removed himself from the equation, it remains to be seen which city councillors will step up to take a leadership role in promoting BRT. But one must wonder if the project will not lose much of its momentum with its biggest proponent sitting on the sidelines during the coming municipal election campaign

Unlike some of the more strident BRT supporters like Shawn Adamsson, Gary Brown and others, it is not my place to tell Londoners how to vote or denigrate them for not sharing my point of view on the project.

I can only suggest that based on the available evidence and conflicting arguments, I am of the opinion that the present BRT proposal be rejected and revised to meet the needs of all Londoners, rather than the “big city” aspirations of a vocal minority.

Revised April 9, 2018

March 3, 2018

Politics, #MeToo, BRT et al

Lots going on in the news since I last posted on this blog. So much in fact that it would take pages and pages to do it all justice.

So rather than bore you, dear reader, I will comment briefly on each.

Politics:

Where to begin?

Locally, a recent poll by Mainstreet London suggests that incumbent Mayor Matt Brown is in trouble with London voters.

Despite huge funding announcements from the province for BRT and education and an apology to London’s LGBT community for past wrongs, Brown is currently running in second place to loony tune Paul Cheng.

Rumours of a high-profile female mayoralty candidate also continue to circulate.

Can Brown reclaim his base by next October? It remains to be seen. For better or worse, his political future is now tied in with the success or failure of London’s proposed BRT project. Stay tuned.

Provincially, the proverbial shit has hit the fan with Ontario PC Leader Patrick Brown’s sudden resignation — the result of accusations of sexual impropriety by two women who have come forward with their stories.

Given the fact that the Brown led PCs would probably have won the provincial election (scheduled for June 2018) the day before he resigned, this changes everything.

Can the PCs find a new leader in time to make a run in June? Will Andrea Horwath’s New Democrats be able to capitalize on Brown’s demise? Will the publicly loathed Wynne Liberals be able to pull another victory out of the fire?

Hopefully, the answers to these questions and others will become clearer in the weeks and months to come.

Meanwhile, PM Justin Trudeau’s sunny ways style of leadership is coming under mounting criticism in regard to issues like immigration and international trade.

Is Trudeau’s honeymoon period with Canadian voters drawing to a close? Stay tuned.,

London’s BRT Project:

Much ink and broadcast time has been devoted to the proposed BRT Project, of both a supportive and negative slant.

Supporters say BRT is essential to London’s growth and development. Great cities deserve great public transit, they say.

Critics claim that the present BRT plan is too costly, caters to Western University and Fanshawe College too much at the expense of other prospective riders, and will be too disruptive to the city and affected neighbourhoods.

Debate on social media platforms has become quite heated with insults flying back and forth daily between pros and cons.

BRT will definitely be the issue in October’s municipal election.

Incumbent Mayor Matt Brown has tied himself to the BRT Project, while the other two announced candidates Paul Cheng and Paul Paolatto either want to scrap it all together or replace it with another proposed plan.

Meanwhile, the city continues to hold information meetings which appear to be attracting more opponents than supporters.

Again, stay tuned to see where this all ends up.

#MeToo & #TimesUp:

The list of powerful men laid low by the #MeToo and #TimesUp movement continues to grow with each passing day.

No sector of society is immune — politics, media, sports, entertainment, literary world and so on.

Due process of law seems to have disappeared and presumption of innocence has been replaced with guilty until proven innocent.

The inevitable blow-back to what is perceived as excesses of the seeming daily disclosures and dismissals has begun with feminists pointing accusatory fingers at each other and many men fearing the knock on their door or a posting on their Facebook page and/or Twitter feed.

In the meantime, careers and reputations are being ruined as the accusations grow in number unabated.

As usual, please feel free to comment on anything I have said in this posting.

 

 

Feeling Trumped-Out? Me Too!

For a little over a year the daily news emanating from the US regarding President Donald Trump has ranged from disturbing to the bizarre. It has been so relentless in its volume, many people, including this writer, have almost become immune to it.

Indeed, I’m Trumped-Out!

If the bastard’s actions didn’t have such a causal impact on Canada, I would declare my computer a Trump Free Zone and wish the Americans well over the next three years.

If only it were that simple.

donald-trump

Perhaps, the US Congress will impeach him, sooner rather than later. Perhaps he will tire of playing the leader of the Free World and step down voluntarily.

One can only hope.

For an excellent analysis of Trump’s dysfunctional presidency, see David Frum’s How Donald Trump turned the United States into a headless giant https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/david-frum-how-donald-trump-turned-the-united-states-into-a-headless-giant/article37588493/